Dexter2020
Faithful Servant
1. NTT Data / ### Incident (###) Breach of Fixed-Term Contract: I was engaged on a one-year contract. This was terminated prematurely on the pretext of "lack of work." However, this was a fraudulent claim, as the role was immediately re-advertised on the NTT Data website, proving the work existed. Coerced Policy Violation: During my tenure at ###, I was forced by ### management to perform API development using their internal systems. This was a direct violation of NTT Data’s corporate security policies. ### knowingly compelled me to bypass established protocols, creating a significant security risk. Legal Proceedings & HR Irregularity: During the legal inquiry into this matter in ###, the HR representative involved resigned during the court reading. This sudden departure suggests an admission of internal failure or an attempt to avoid accountability for the irregular termination.
2. ### / ### Incident (###) 1. Incident Overview (### ### ###) During my tenure at ### via ###, I was subjected to extreme working hours that far exceeded standard industry practices and human safety limits. While my contract stipulated standard hours, I was coerced into working from 08:30 to 03:00 (18.5 hours per day), seven days a week. This was not a "mutual agreement" as later claimed; it was a mandatory requirement imposed under duress.
2. Medical Consequences and Employer Negligence As a direct result of this 115+ hour work week, I suffered from severe dehydration and physical exhaustion, leading to emergency hospitalization. The employer failed in their Duty of Care under the Workplace Safety and Health Act by maintaining a schedule that made physical collapse inevitable.
3. Pretextual Termination (Probation Failure) Following my hospitalization, the company cited a "failure to pass probation" as the grounds for termination. I contend that this was a pretextual dismissal. The termination was not based on professional incompetence, but was instead a direct reaction to my medical inability to continue working illegal/unsustainable hours. Using "probation failure" was an excuse to avoid accountability for the physical harm caused during my employment.
4. Disparity in Treatment I observed a significant disparity in how labor standards were applied. While I, as a Singaporean PMET, was pressured into these extreme hours without the protection of Part IV of the Employment Act, other segments of the workforce such as foreign PMET were shielded from such abuse. This suggests a targeted exploitation of my specific employment status at the time. Can Jesus Christ Solve this
2. ### / ### Incident (###) 1. Incident Overview (### ### ###) During my tenure at ### via ###, I was subjected to extreme working hours that far exceeded standard industry practices and human safety limits. While my contract stipulated standard hours, I was coerced into working from 08:30 to 03:00 (18.5 hours per day), seven days a week. This was not a "mutual agreement" as later claimed; it was a mandatory requirement imposed under duress.
2. Medical Consequences and Employer Negligence As a direct result of this 115+ hour work week, I suffered from severe dehydration and physical exhaustion, leading to emergency hospitalization. The employer failed in their Duty of Care under the Workplace Safety and Health Act by maintaining a schedule that made physical collapse inevitable.
3. Pretextual Termination (Probation Failure) Following my hospitalization, the company cited a "failure to pass probation" as the grounds for termination. I contend that this was a pretextual dismissal. The termination was not based on professional incompetence, but was instead a direct reaction to my medical inability to continue working illegal/unsustainable hours. Using "probation failure" was an excuse to avoid accountability for the physical harm caused during my employment.
4. Disparity in Treatment I observed a significant disparity in how labor standards were applied. While I, as a Singaporean PMET, was pressured into these extreme hours without the protection of Part IV of the Employment Act, other segments of the workforce such as foreign PMET were shielded from such abuse. This suggests a targeted exploitation of my specific employment status at the time. Can Jesus Christ Solve this
