17 hours ago, Steven Bobb said:
I know Christians are "taught" to believe that,but I don't buy it for a few reasons.One, I think it "shortchanges" God. saying it's the ONLY way He can get to us,He doesn't know any better way.To Christians, that seems to be the ONLY way God knows.Second, it doesn't always work;in my case and other posts I read, some Christians feel more grateful to God when He blesses them, not gives them, or lets them stay in, hardships.Thirdly, by that logic,masochists would be the most spiritual people on Earth.Does that way of thinking imply that every time a masochist gets beaten with a cat of nine tails,he gets more spiritual?Yey many masochists are atheists.. Also, the Hindus believe in torturing themselves fo win God over,but with that suffering, they'restill pagans.Also, those in the Lake of Fire , by that logic,must be the most godly of all, because they suffer for eternity,but we know they're anything but.So again, that "one size fits all",parrot like response to EVERYONE with every problem, I can't say it always applies.
My reply is on the blog page.
1. Is suffering the only way for God to reach us? No. The exact reason for why God uses suffering to teach us lessons is unknown to us. The Bible says that He uses suffering to teach us lessons, to purify us, and to draw us closer to God. But as far as I know, the Bible doesn't actually say why God chooses to do it this way. My theory is that this is the only way God can reach us at times without violating our free will. During times of hardship and trial, we come of our own free will to God, begging Him to intervene. God cannot help us without violating our free will unless we surrender our free will to God. Yes, God could simply snap His fingers and say, "It is done." But that is not how He usually chooses to work.
2. Nobody enjoys suffering. The Bible says, "Now no chastening for the present seemeth to be joyous, but grievous: nevertheless afterward it yieldeth the peaceable fruit of righteousness unto them which are exercised thereby." (Hebrews 12:11) Now, this verse is talking about punishment, but the same principal applies to suffering.
For example, do you feel grateful when you are broke, without a penny in the bank, and the rent coming up? Of course not. Do you enjoy it? No. But it does make you get down on your knees in prayer before God, begging Him to intervene. It makes you get desperate with the Lord. And in doing so, it serves a dual purpose. a) God will supply your needs, for He has never failed His children, b) thus reinforcing your faith and trust in Him
3. As I said before, suffering of itself isn't beneficial, it is what is born of suffering that is beneficial. Masochists love or enjoy suffering for the sake of suffering. They do not cry out to God in their distress, they do not seek His name. God uses suffering, but not all suffering is from God. The attacks of the Devil, for instance. The lake of fire is the punishment for the wicked, it is not meant to be a tool for teaching a lesson, though perhaps it could be argued that the lesson there is that they should have obeyed God, they should have accepted Him, they should have surrendered their will to Him.
For example, if I were to take a hammer and hit it against my toe on purpose, what purpose would that serve? What lesson would I learn? None. That is an example of suffering for the sake of suffering. There is no lesson to be learned except perhaps that I really shouldn't do that a second time.