Am I A “Cliffs Notes” Christian?

As an English Lit Major, Journalism Majors, todays “journalists of the world,” and I, via prerequisite curricula, shared many of the same English classes. I have often noted the “pupa-reporters” were so busy preparing to be journalists that they wouldn’t have “time” to do their reading before class, less likely complete a slew of entire novels the night before exams. Many times they only had “time” for The “Cliffs,” “Barnes” or “Sparks Notes” version of the original works themselves.

These brief synopses of the books gave one the overall “gist” of the storyline, main characters and themes, yet it was devoid of the beauty and literary genius conveyed by a book as a work of art itself, able to leave its fingerprints on the soul. Compare watching a trailer to watching a movie (and the book is always better than the movie ; )

To compound this dilemma, since the whole class got graded on a curve (with the best grades and the worst grades omitted), not only was much of the class discussion time spent educating those that came to class — it seemingly didn’t matter since nearly everyone got As, maybe Bs — if they just came to class, probably Cs or Ds if they didn’t. (Yes, I’m blowing the whistle on the education system of the Liberal Arts — that’s how dumbed down was the grading and it’s been progressively worse through the years... It used to be standard (up until probably the 1950s) to learn English, Latin, French, German, Greek & Hebrew — it was called a “classical education.” You wouldn’t believe what they pass for college exit exams now, I’ve graded the CAHSEE... if they can chop through pidgin english they graduate high school, according to the CaliforniA High School Exit Exams... But I digress...

The harder trade-off was that the pupil was at the mercy of whomever had pre-digested the watered-down version of the literary masterpiece and regurgitated it in the Cliffs notes or Barnes Notes — most “students” were totally unaware even that other people had surreptitiously “injected” “infected” parts to the “Cliffs Notes” or “Sparks Notes” that were purposely marred or outright inaccurate, for the end that the professor might tell who was using plagiarized “intellectual content” and had not come to the author’s original intent through their own studies and deductions.

Now there were some journalists that did and possibly still do study, but while watching the reporters ask some of the same questions to The Coronavirus Team that were already addressed last week, 3 repeats in one hour of questions — today alone — it dawned on me the revelation of my college days: some people are still not ready for class, and others are barely cramming, others cheating off their friends or agencies so they could ask a significant question. They had, and are, like when in college, missed and are missing the primary intent for which they were there then and are before The President, Country and World at present — To report on what The President and The Taskforce had said to do to ensure the overall escape from the pandemic of a plague and thereby, “Live!” (Eziekiel 16:6).

Now it bothers me a bit more than it did back then because the whole world is watching here and these are reporters to The President of The United States and The Coronavirus Taskforce — I would hope these people writing the headlines half the world will swallow “hook, line and sinker” would be the crem d’la crem. Not only is The Team’s time wasted, but the public’s time as well.

Now as I reflected on that, I noticed why that certain type of Christian who never really has time to study the Whole Word of God often gets along limping in their understanding of The Ways of God and therefore of God Himself. They will ask questions out loud on things God has already given clear answers on like, “How Come God Does This or That” or say things like, “God Would Never Do Such and Such,” though the Bible is replete with both History of the attestation of not only the day, time, year and hour He did such things, but also with the “why” He did them and for what was their didactic intent.

The reason, as I deduce, is that they may not have either read The Bible completely, or they didn’t understand it, or worse, rejected the revelation since it was incongruent with their own idolatrous image of God himself — or the worst — they read someone else’s “Cliffs Notes” version of God, not the image of God derived from The Original Copy signed and sealed through the ages.

See, the strange thing I found was, was that the better I understood what the author had written, the better I understood the author himself, and then the better I was at being able to understand the works of the author, and then the better equipped to interpret what he had written (for I better grasped his overall intent) — “line upon line, precept upon precept” (Isaiah 28:10).

That is exactly the point from where I started reading the Bible — I came to it as a student of God, looking to see all that had been written, so I might better grasp the one who wrote it and understand the parts of it within its framework — the way a house or a horse in a puzzle is really only comprehended when I have completed the puzzle in entirety — the house adjacent to a fenced field in proximity to the larger world and the rider is coming out for his daily ride with his friend, the horse, bringing his favorites: a juicy, orange carrot and three sugar cubes, and he has a brush in his hand, but no saddle is on the horse. Do you see? And he sees a storm is coming, for the clouds are on one side of the pasture, but there is a candle in the stable, and he will take the horse for a lap as the sun is setting before the storm comes and then they can both go into the barn...

Let’s not get focused on individual pieces but see how they connect in relation to the sum of the whole, hmmm? “The sum of Thy Word is truth, and every one of Thy righteous commandments endureth forever” (Ps 119:160).

Let me ask the question — what’s more important than reading the entire Bible through? It’s only 84.5 hours in length, Genesis through Revelation (66 Books). That’s 23 minutes a day to know all that’s recorded about God. that’s the genealogies, the so and so begat so and so, the numbering of the troops and tribes, the candle-snuffers, palm trees, food offerings and pomegranates. He hides some gems of revelation in the most obscure places...

Go ahead— ask me if I think it’s worth the investment!

“The secret things belong to the LORD our God, but the things revealed belong to us and to our children forever, so that we may follow all the words of this law” (Deut 29:29).

Book One, Genesis
 
Last edited:
Examples of what you say, like I have 2 that came to mind..one person debated me ,believing in annihilationism, saying God would not sent anyone to Hell,{even though we read verses like, "they will be tormented day and night forever and ever",also, "some will go into everlasting life, and others , into everlasting torment" and another one was debating me saying someone outside of Christianity could go to Heaven{although Jesus told Nicodemus,"Unless a man is born again, he cannot see the kingdom of God."
 
Yes, they are examples of different parts of the picture but my main point is to get the entire picture by studying the entire Bible and within that framework there is the reality of eternal judgement since God is an Eternal Judge — among all the other attributes that might be more placable and tolerable like Savior and Shepherd. For instance, John, the Beloved Apostle, who knew Jesus as Savior, Teacher and Master, fell as a dead man when He met Jesus (Bronze Feet revealing judgement, who found something against 6 of the 7 churches and would have removed their lampstands unless they repented and only gives rewards if they overcome and judges Babylon the world’s system through the Book of Revelation so He can show mercy on those that are not immoral and et cetera in The New Jerusalem).

So eternal judgement is kind of a part of the whole, can’t appreciate eternal reward and salvation unless there is something to be saved from eternally. But The God of Revelation is seen to be the same in Exodus pronouncing judgement on Egypt and Pharaoh so that Israel can know deliverance from bondage and from a land of slavery to a Land of Promise and all throughout the Bible we see similarities — so we get the Characteristic of God as Judge through the Bible so we know don’t push God too far or He will act in a manner congruent with His character since that is who God is and He cannot change, (unless we repent because He loves to show mercy when we repent.

For instance, that’s why we believe for healing and for God to lessen the judgement of the coronavirus because He has shown Himself to be merciful to plagues all throughout the Bible if we repent and ask Him to check the plague. In fact you can’t have mercy unless there is a judgement from which God can show mercy. Do you see I’m talking about the individual attributes substantiated from the history of His dealings in The Bible that show what God is like. I’m saying let’s read the whole Bible a lot. A real lot so we know what God is like from what He has revealed about Himself.

“Then those who feared the Lord spoke with each other, and the Lord listened to what they said. In his presence, a scroll of remembrance was written to record the names of those who feared him and always thought about the honor of his name. “They will be my people,” says the Lord of Heaven’s Armies. “On the day when I act in judgment, they will be my own special treasure. I will spare them as a father spares an obedient child. Then you will again see the difference between the righteous and the wicked, between those who serve God and those who do not.””
‭‭Malachi‬ ‭3:16-18‬ ‭NLT‬‬

Examples of what you say, like I have 2 that came to mind..one person debated me ,believing in annihilationism, saying God would not sent anyone to Hell,{even though we read verses like, "they will be tormented day and night forever and ever",also, "some will go into everlasting life, and others , into everlasting torment" and another one was debating me saying someone outside of Christianity could go to Heaven{although Jesus told Nicodemus,"Unless a man is born again, he cannot see the kingdom of God."
 
I think also the problem with these "misinterpretations",yes, the Bible is our bread,I can't get inside each persons mind, or individual case, some could be what you said, just lack of knowledge from not getting into it enough,but I think 2 other problems can be added,one, they may have picked an aberrant church with wrong doctrines ,and so were taught that for years{"brainwashed" if you will}, and the second is someone who believes wrong doctrines because it "comforts them"if they have unsaved loved ones who died, so they "feel better" if they tell themselves that God wouldn't "have the heart" to send people to hell.I think this is what the Bible describes as having itching ears,or having their ears tickled.They believe what "sounds good",and throw out the rest.I think if the first example, the one who was in a false church, reads the Bible throughout, they have more of a chance of coming to knowledge.They just have to "reeducate" themselves". The one who ,for example , "picks and chooses" what they want to believe, a "feel good Gospel", reading through the BIble might not help, because they could just "throw out" the verses that sound "too harsh" to them.
 
Not the point of the article, though. Have you ever heard the way people were trained to spot counterfeit currency? They were trained to study the original currency for years and years and then they could discern the false. If we know the Bible well, we can “discern the things that differ” (Phil 1). Just wondering if you read the entire post?
I think also the problem with these "misinterpretations",yes, the Bible is our bread,I can't get inside each persons mind, or individual case, some could be what you said, just lack of knowledge from not getting into it enough,but I think 2 other problems can be added,one, they may have picked an aberrant church with wrong doctrines ,and so were taught that for years{"brainwashed" if you will}, and the second is someone who believes wrong doctrines because it "comforts them"if they have unsaved loved ones who died, so they "feel better" if they tell themselves that God wouldn't "have the heart" to send people to hell.I think this is what the Bible describes as having itching ears,or having their ears tickled.They believe what "sounds good",and throw out the rest.I think if the first example, the one who was in a false church, reads the Bible throughout, they have more of a chance of coming to knowledge.They just have to "reeducate" themselves". The one who ,for example , "picks and chooses" what they want to believe, a "feel good Gospel", reading through the BIble might not help, because they could just "throw out" the verses that sound "too harsh" to them.
 
Last edited:
Not the point of the article, though. Have you ever heard the way people were trained to spot counterfeit currency? They were trained to study the original currency for years and years and then they could discern the false. If we know the Bible well, we can “discern the things that differ” (Phil 1). Just wondering if you read the entire post?
Yeah,but the only thing,like I say, if someone has a "stubborn spirit"picking and choosing what they want,they might "brush off " what the Spirit is telling them, like willfully choosing what they "want to hear", if they resist what the Spirit tells them.I would say if God opens their spiritual eyes, and they overcome their "resistance".One thing, about what you posted about all the pieces must fit together,that is an area I think a lot of people get stumbled on, which is why one would say, this verse backs up "my" point, but another would give another verse that seemingly backs up "their" point,and the debate is on.That's what I agree with about your point of we have to look at the whole picture.I myself have read the Bible cover to cover twice, and I also sometimes get a little confused that one verse seems to state something, and at a different point in the Bible another verse seems to state something contrary. So there, I think your point about putting all the pieces of the puzzle together, would clear up that.
 
As an English Lit Major, Journalism Majors, todays “journalists of the world,” and I, via prerequisite curricula, shared many of the same English classes. I have often noted the “pupa-reporters” were so busy preparing to be journalists that they wouldn’t have “time” to do their reading before class, less likely complete a slew of entire novels the night before exams. Many times they only had “time” for The “Cliffs,” “Barnes” or “Sparks Notes” version of the original works themselves.

These brief synopses of the books gave one the overall “gist” of the storyline, main characters and themes, yet it was devoid of the beauty and literary genius conveyed by a book as a work of art itself, able to leave its fingerprints on the soul. Compare watching a trailer to watching a movie (and the book is always better than the movie ; )

To compound this dilemma, since the whole class got graded on a curve (with the best grades and the worst grades omitted), not only was much of the class discussion time spent educating those that came to class — it seemingly didn’t matter since nearly everyone got As, maybe Bs — if they just came to class, probably Cs or Ds if they didn’t. (Yes, I’m blowing the whistle on the education system of the Liberal Arts — that’s how dumbed down was the grading and it’s been progressively worse through the years... It used to be standard (up until probably the 1950s) to learn English, Latin, French, German, Greek & Hebrew — it was called a “classical education.” You wouldn’t believe what they pass for college exit exams now, I’ve graded the CAHSEE... if they can chop through pidgin english they graduate high school, according to the CaliforniA High School Exit Exams... But I digress...

The harder trade-off was that the pupil was at the mercy of whomever had pre-digested the watered-down version of the literary masterpiece and regurgitated it in the Cliffs notes or Barnes Notes — most “students” were totally unaware even that other people had surreptitiously “injected” “infected” parts to the “Cliffs Notes” or “Sparks Notes” that were purposely marred or outright inaccurate, for the end that the professor might tell who was using plagiarized “intellectual content” and had not come to the author’s original intent through their own studies and deductions.

Now there were some journalists that did and possibly still do study, but while watching the reporters ask some of the same questions to The Coronavirus Team that were already addressed last week, 3 repeats in one hour of questions — today alone — it dawned on me the revelation of my college days: some people are still not ready for class, and others are barely cramming, others cheating off their friends or agencies so they could ask a significant question. They had, and are, like when in college, missed and are missing the primary intent for which they were there then and are before The President, Country and World at present — To report on what The President and The Taskforce had said to do to ensure the overall escape from the pandemic of a plague and thereby, “Live!” (Eziekiel 16:6).

Now it bothers me a bit more than it did back then because the whole world is watching here and these are reporters to The President of The United States and The Coronavirus Taskforce — I would hope these people writing the headlines half the world will swallow “hook, line and sinker” would be the crem d’la crem. Not only is The Team’s time wasted, but the public’s time as well.

Now as I reflected on that, I noticed why that certain type of Christian who never really has time to study the Whole Word of God often gets along limping in their understanding of The Ways of God and therefore of God Himself. They will ask questions out loud on things God has already given clear answers on like, “How Come God Does This or That” or say things like, “God Would Never Do Such and Such,” though the Bible is replete with both History of the attestation of not only the day, time, year and hour He did such things, but also with the “why” He did them and for what was their didactic intent.

The reason, as I deduce, is that they may not have either read The Bible completely, or they didn’t understand it, or worse, rejected the revelation since it was incongruent with their own idolatrous image of God himself — or the worst — they read someone else’s “Cliffs Notes” version of God, not the image of God derived from The Original Copy signed and sealed through the ages.

See, the strange thing I found was, was that the better I understood what the author had written, the better I understood the author himself, and then the better I was at being able to understand the works of the author, and then the better equipped to interpret what he had written (for I better grasped his overall intent) — “line upon line, precept upon precept” (Isaiah 28:10).

That is exactly the point from where I started reading the Bible — I came to it as a student of God, looking to see all that had been written, so I might better grasp the one who wrote it and understand the parts of it within its framework — the way a house or a horse in a puzzle is really only comprehended when I have completed the puzzle in entirety — the house adjacent to a fenced field in proximity to the larger world and the rider is coming out for his daily ride with his friend, the horse, bringing his favorites: a juicy, orange carrot and three sugar cubes, and he has a brush in his hand, but no saddle is on the horse. Do you see? And he sees a storm is coming, for the clouds are on one side of the pasture, but there is a candle in the stable, and he will take the horse for a lap as the sun is setting before the storm comes and then they can both go into the barn...

Let’s not get focused on individual pieces but see how they connect in relation to the sum of the whole, hmmm? “The sum of Thy Word is truth, and every one of Thy righteous commandments endureth forever” (Ps 119:160).

Let me ask the question — what’s more important than reading the entire Bible through? It’s only 84.5 hours in length, Genesis through Revelation (66 Books). That’s 23 minutes a day to know all that’s recorded about God. that’s the genealogies, the so and so begat so and so, the numbering of the troops and tribes, the candle-snuffers, palm trees, food offerings and pomegranates. He hides some gems of revelation in the most obscure places...

Go ahead— ask me if I think it’s worth the investment!

“The secret things belong to the LORD our God, but the things revealed belong to us and to our children forever, so that we may follow all the words of this law” (Deut 29:29).

Book One, Genesis
As an English Lit Major, Journalism Majors, todays “journalists of the world,” and I, via prerequisite curricula, shared many of the same English classes. I have often noted the “pupa-reporters” were so busy preparing to be journalists that they wouldn’t have “time” to do their reading before class, less likely complete a slew of entire novels the night before exams. Many times they only had “time” for The “Cliffs,” “Barnes” or “Sparks Notes” version of the original works themselves.

These brief synopses of the books gave one the overall “gist” of the storyline, main characters and themes, yet it was devoid of the beauty and literary genius conveyed by a book as a work of art itself, able to leave its fingerprints on the soul. Compare watching a trailer to watching a movie (and the book is always better than the movie ; )

To compound this dilemma, since the whole class got graded on a curve (with the best grades and the worst grades omitted), not only was much of the class discussion time spent educating those that came to class — it seemingly didn’t matter since nearly everyone got As, maybe Bs — if they just came to class, probably Cs or Ds if they didn’t. (Yes, I’m blowing the whistle on the education system of the Liberal Arts — that’s how dumbed down was the grading and it’s been progressively worse through the years... It used to be standard (up until probably the 1950s) to learn English, Latin, French, German, Greek & Hebrew — it was called a “classical education.” You wouldn’t believe what they pass for college exit exams now, I’ve graded the CAHSEE... if they can chop through pidgin english they graduate high school, according to the CaliforniA High School Exit Exams... But I digress...

The harder trade-off was that the pupil was at the mercy of whomever had pre-digested the watered-down version of the literary masterpiece and regurgitated it in the Cliffs notes or Barnes Notes — most “students” were totally unaware even that other people had surreptitiously “injected” “infected” parts to the “Cliffs Notes” or “Sparks Notes” that were purposely marred or outright inaccurate, for the end that the professor might tell who was using plagiarized “intellectual content” and had not come to the author’s original intent through their own studies and deductions.

Now there were some journalists that did and possibly still do study, but while watching the reporters ask some of the same questions to The Coronavirus Team that were already addressed last week, 3 repeats in one hour of questions — today alone — it dawned on me the revelation of my college days: some people are still not ready for class, and others are barely cramming, others cheating off their friends or agencies so they could ask a significant question. They had, and are, like when in college, missed and are missing the primary intent for which they were there then and are before The President, Country and World at present — To report on what The President and The Taskforce had said to do to ensure the overall escape from the pandemic of a plague and thereby, “Live!” (Eziekiel 16:6).

Now it bothers me a bit more than it did back then because the whole world is watching here and these are reporters to The President of The United States and The Coronavirus Taskforce — I would hope these people writing the headlines half the world will swallow “hook, line and sinker” would be the crem d’la crem. Not only is The Team’s time wasted, but the public’s time as well.

Now as I reflected on that, I noticed why that certain type of Christian who never really has time to study the Whole Word of God often gets along limping in their understanding of The Ways of God and therefore of God Himself. They will ask questions out loud on things God has already given clear answers on like, “How Come God Does This or That” or say things like, “God Would Never Do Such and Such,” though the Bible is replete with both History of the attestation of not only the day, time, year and hour He did such things, but also with the “why” He did them and for what was their didactic intent.

The reason, as I deduce, is that they may not have either read The Bible completely, or they didn’t understand it, or worse, rejected the revelation since it was incongruent with their own idolatrous image of God himself — or the worst — they read someone else’s “Cliffs Notes” version of God, not the image of God derived from The Original Copy signed and sealed through the ages.

See, the strange thing I found was, was that the better I understood what the author had written, the better I understood the author himself, and then the better I was at being able to understand the works of the author, and then the better equipped to interpret what he had written (for I better grasped his overall intent) — “line upon line, precept upon precept” (Isaiah 28:10).

That is exactly the point from where I started reading the Bible — I came to it as a student of God, looking to see all that had been written, so I might better grasp the one who wrote it and understand the parts of it within its framework — the way a house or a horse in a puzzle is really only comprehended when I have completed the puzzle in entirety — the house adjacent to a fenced field in proximity to the larger world and the rider is coming out for his daily ride with his friend, the horse, bringing his favorites: a juicy, orange carrot and three sugar cubes, and he has a brush in his hand, but no saddle is on the horse. Do you see? And he sees a storm is coming, for the clouds are on one side of the pasture, but there is a candle in the stable, and he will take the horse for a lap as the sun is setting before the storm comes and then they can both go into the barn...

Let’s not get focused on individual pieces but see how they connect in relation to the sum of the whole, hmmm? “The sum of Thy Word is truth, and every one of Thy righteous commandments endureth forever” (Ps 119:160).

Let me ask the question — what’s more important than reading the entire Bible through? It’s only 84.5 hours in length, Genesis through Revelation (66 Books). That’s 23 minutes a day to know all that’s recorded about God. that’s the genealogies, the so and so begat so and so, the numbering of the troops and tribes, the candle-snuffers, palm trees, food offerings and pomegranates. He hides some gems of revelation in the most obscure places...

Go ahead— ask me if I think it’s worth the investment!

“The secret things belong to the LORD our God, but the things revealed belong to us and to our children forever, so that we may follow all the words of this law” (Deut 29:29).

Book One, Genesis
Biblical hermeneuticsis the study of the principles of interpretation concerning the books of the Bible. It involves the study of the principles of communication, for all forms verbal and non verbal. Biblical literalist believe that, unless a passage is clearly intended by the writer as allegory, poetry or some other genre,the Bible should be interpreted as literal statements by the author.
Alternatively the term can refer to historical or grammatical method, this is a hermeneutic technique that strives to uncover the meaning of the text by taking into account not just the grammatical words but also the syntactical and cultural aspects, the literary genre as well as the historical background. This approach is useful in getting the correct meaning of the text as it was originally written by the author.
During The Easter Season I sent a WhatsApp Video to my cousin who is a Jehovah's Witness. She rebuked means even laughed at me saying that Jesus did not die on a cross. He was crucified on a tree.She sent several scriptures for me to read to substantiate her point.I responded y sending two highly researched documentary from reputable sources for her to read.They proved that during the time of Jesus' death the Roman practiced crucifixion on a cross.She had not responded To back up your argument she said that God is loving and kind and would not punish anyone in Hell because that would be against his nature. I refused to enter into a debate but in my mind I reflected on the Exodus,Noah's Flood, Sodom a d Gommorah and the would be destruction of Ninevah if Jonah had not earned the people..The s rupture tells us that God prefers not the death of a sinner but that the sinner should repent and live.
 
Yes, hermeneutics. I started as a student in Recombinant Gene Technology outside of NYC before ethical arguments had me turn to English out in Cali. There was a good amount of reading on hermeneutics prescribed. Isabel Rivers out of Cambridge wrote, “Classical and Christian Ideas in English Renaissance Poetry.” Her revelation was that the majority of English writers had such a thorough grasp of The Bible (especially until the end of the 19th Century), that unless one became familiar with The Bible you couldn’t understand the writings. Later I studied theology at Westminster in Philadelphia. When Princeton started going to a liberal interpretation, the smartest and most honest students made an exodus from Princeton and formed Westminster. Though “Temple” was allegorical, it was also literal as the body is the temple if the Lord, and Jesus seemed to take Scripture quite literally when he would quote “it is written” and predicted resurrection in a literal three days. Most of the errors in the world are in response to and are the fallout from the mainline seminaries going liberal in the late 19th and early 20th Century. The Bible explains itself. Jesus will show that to have been His intention in the Resurrection from The Dead when the literal books are opened.

Biblical hermeneuticsis the study of the principles of interpretation concerning the books of the Bible. It involves the study of the principles of communication, for all forms verbal and non verbal. Biblical literalist believe that, unless a passage is clearly intended by the writer as allegory, poetry or some other genre,the Bible should be interpreted as literal statements by the author.
Alternatively the term can refer to historical or grammatical method, this is a hermeneutic technique that strives to uncover the meaning of the text by taking into account not just the grammatical words but also the syntactical and cultural aspects, the literary genre as well as the historical background. This approach is useful in getting the correct meaning of the text as it was originally written by the author.
During The Easter Season I sent a WhatsApp Video to my cousin who is a Jehovah's Witness. She rebuked means even laughed at me saying that Jesus did not die on a cross. He was crucified on a tree.She sent several scriptures for me to read to substantiate her point.I responded y sending two highly researched documentary from reputable sources for her to read.They proved that during the time of Jesus' death the Roman practiced crucifixion on a cross.She had not responded To back up your argument she said that God is loving and kind and would not punish anyone in Hell because that would be against his nature. I refused to enter into a debate but in my mind I reflected on the Exodus,Noah's Flood, Sodom a d Gommorah and the would be destruction of Ninevah if Jonah had not earned the people..The s rupture tells us that God prefers not the death of a sinner but that the sinner should repent and live.
 
Last edited:

Similar Requests

  • Article Article
```markdown Is Your Marriage Truly Healthy, or Just “Okay”? You might say your marriage is “fine.” But what if “fine” is masking deep dissatisfaction? In a recent Barna Research Group study commissioned by Marriage Helper, over 1,500 U.S. adults shared insights about their marriages—and the...
Replies
0
Views
315
Pray that as of now if ### do not reply then I am done with the Christian Dating App firstly she did not put her photo and I do not know if she is real or another guy posing as a girl and do not want to waste any more time or money on this platform as it created unnecessary hurts like ghosting...
Replies
8
Views
121
I am Christian but in these last few months I am finding it difficult to pray. Please continue to pray for ### and myself. Continue to pray that the Lord will open supernatural doors for the process to start for ### to get his Permanent Residency. Currently he is going through depression, even...
Replies
11
Views
399
Your donations for running this web site are greatly appreciated.

Click To Make A Donation

Forum statistics

Threads
1,986,553
Messages
15,824,742
Members
545,540
Latest member
Galaemorgate

Latest Blogs & Articles

Back
Top Bottom