There seems to be a different outlook between myself and certain others, even some unsaved people, and also some Christians. That wanting to learn more about certain Biblical things, and how this relates to that, is a "bad" thing. I disagree. Because, 1, it was my "curiosity" that actually brought me to the Lord. I had a yearning for Biblical things, and so when I saw books, like Hal Lindsey books on prophecy, but also salvation, I wanted to read them, and learned of salvation through them. If I would've "put my hands over my eyes" and be afraid to "poke," I wouldn't have found anything out, and remained unsaved, right? Also, there are Christian sites dedicated to answering Biblical questions, like "Got Questions.Org." {Also, televangelists, who read "questions from followers."} Also, notice now the nature of cults. They try to "control" their followers. "If we tell you to let your baby die, rather than disobey our leader, you must do so." But those who tell me not to ask about Biblical things, curiosity is bad, do you want to have similarities with these cults? I think trying to "squelch" people from thinking and being curious started as a control tactic. The other reason, I think, is fear. The person is afraid to question, they just tune out their minds to anything. But I say, not all curiosity is bad. There have been cases where, over history, people have come up with great inventions by being "curious." And like I say, my "curiosity" led me to get saved. Even animals—they "poke around" until they find a place that benefits them. My point? Not all curiosity is bad, or "evil." {In Eve's case it was, or in Lot's wife's case. But not always.} In some cases, it might advance us. As long as it's directed the right way. Because some have told me I do raise interesting points, but others have tried to "hush, hush" me. Nicodemus' curiosity led him to come to Jesus in the night, asking questions. I just say, don't paint all curiosity as being bad.

